LG 32UN650-W 31.5 Inch UHD (3840 x 2160) IPS Ultrafine Display with HDR10 Compatibility, DCI-P3 95% Color Gamut, AMD FreeSync, and 3-Side Virtually Borderless Height Adjustable Stand, Silve/White : Amazon.ca: Electronics
Фото покупателей 1
Динамика цены
Хотите узнать когда цена на этот товар снизится? Нажмите «Следить за ценой» и мы сообщим вам!
Характеристики
Описание
LG 32UN650-W 31.5 Inch UHD (3840 x 2160) IPS Ultrafine Display with HDR10 Compatibility, DCI-P3 95% Color Gamut, AMD FreeSync, and 3-Side Virtually Borderless Height Adjustable Stand, Silve/White : Amazon.ca: Electronics
Отзывы о товаре 5
Фото покупателей 1
Willard Pearson
We use the monitors for gaming on Xbox series x. They work perfectly with the Xbox series x and seem to be the only monitors with speakers. Why I bought 2 of these monitors.
Anna
4K and 144 hertz, good for the money, color rendition is good, but you need to get used to it if you have previously used other monitors with other matrix technologies. The screen is very large but the resolution is sufficient. Viewing angles are not the greatest, but if this is the main monitor and one monitor, then it’s enough. Mostly satisfied!
Marc-André
My father helped me to buy this replacing 4k screen for my PC . I'm into video production on my own and I work with low budgets. It's amazing , the colors are very nice.Some complain about the HDR being low budget HDR. Maybe but it's a screen made for realistic color kit and it feels very goergous . It has 10 bits colors options , 32 bits depth and the HDR adds a bit of graduation in colors. Working on photos or videos with this screen is very pleasing for me. It's a IPS screen so color fidelity is better than with VA panels that have some interresting abilities but are less realistic on the photo work and blurry sometimes for video precision according to what I've read.Anyway , for a screen with last high end HDR ( more than HDR400 ) settings and a IPS panel mounted on a metal solid frame as good as this 32 inch one , you'd have to pay around 900$ CAD so this one has what I wanted and too much HDR is no good. I even turn it off for video or photo editing sometimes when I want to avoid decontrasting feeling . HDR's good for games but this screen is not at my point of view a perfect gaming screen. Not for Nvidia GPU's but I don't care as I'm using it for work on 3d scenes and post-production.Very pleased even if it's my first day using it. If you're a multimedia worker , you may like this as a work screen.
dewdew
It's one of the cheapest 4k monitors with bare minimum specs so obviously it's not going to be as great as higher quality monitors and you shouldn't expect too much, can't really complain much for the price. For what it is it's adequate and fair priced for my usage as a second/third monitor. Of course it should not be used a main monitor for gaming with it being only 60hz and not 1ms response time unless you play light games where that does not matter. Being a VA panel it definitely has noticeably quality differences when it comes to colors and angles but the clarity is not affected. If you're only looking for a secondary where the factors mentioned above is not important then there's no reason I can point out not to get it, it works as it should.
Guangyi
The one I got has no bad pixels. The color display is accurate, it can be adjusted to the same as my MacBook built-in, you just need time to play with settings. The display control menu is pretty advanced. Under 4K input, this monitor didn't have any problem that I can complain about.Some small downside: Built-in speaker is so-so. OnScreen control function for this monitor only support Windows!!! No Mac compatible software on the official website. I got the macOS version application but it said my monitor doesn't support adjustment... For Mac user, the OnScreen control software can only help you divide screen to multiple sections, which is pretty awesome feature if you'd like to display several windows at a time.Anyway I'd rate it 80 out of 100 at this price!